|
Socrates Scoring
| Transfer the
client's answers from questionnaire (see note below): |
| Recognition |
Ambivalence |
Taking Steps |
| 1 ________ |
2 ________ |
4 ________ |
| 3 ________ |
5 ________ |
|
| |
6 ________ |
|
| 7 ________ |
|
8 ________ |
| |
9 ________ |
|
| 10 ________ |
11 ________ |
|
| 12 ________ |
|
13 ________ |
| |
14 ________ |
|
| 15 ________ |
16 ________ |
|
| 17 ________ |
|
18 ________ |
| |
|
19 ________ |
| Totals: Re: ________ |
Am: ________ |
Ts: ________ |
SOCRATES Profile Sheet (19-Item Version 8A)
INSTRUCTIONS: From the SOCRATES Scoring Form (19-Item
Version) transfer the total scale scores into the empty boxes at the
bottom of the Profile Sheet. Then for each scale, CIRCLE the same value
above it to determine the decile range.
| DECILE SCORES |
Recognition |
Ambivalence |
Taking Steps |
| 90 (Very High) |
|
19-20 |
39-40 |
| 80 |
|
18 |
37-38 |
| 70 (High) |
35 |
17 |
36 |
| 60 |
34 |
16 |
34-35 |
| 50 (Medium) |
32-33 |
15 |
33 |
| 40 |
31 |
14 |
31-32 |
| 30 (Low) |
29-30 |
12-13 |
30 |
| 20 |
27-28 |
9-11 |
26-29 |
| 10 (Very Low) |
7-26 |
4-8 |
8-25 |
RAW SCORES
(from Scoring Sheet) |
Re= |
Am= |
Ts= |
These interpretive ranges are based on a sample of
1,726 adult men and women presenting for treatment of alcohol problems
through Project MATCH. Note that individual scores are therefore being
ranked as low, medium, or high relative to people already presenting for
alcohol treatment.
Guidelines for Interpretation of
SOCRATES-8 Scores
Using the SOCRATES Profile Sheet, circle the client's
raw score within each of the three scale columns. This provides
information as to whether the client's scores are low, average, or high
relative to people already seeking treatment for alcohol problems. The
following are provided as general guidelines for interpretation of
scores, but it is wise in an individual case also to examine individual
item responses for additional information.
RECOGNITION
HIGH scorers directly acknowledge that they are
having problems related to their drinking, tending to express a desire
for change and to perceive that harm will continue if they do not
change.
LOW scorers deny that alcohol is causing them serious
problems, reject diagnostic labels such as "problem drinker" and
"alcoholic," and do not express a desire for change.
AMBIVALENCE
HIGH scorers say that they sometimes wonder if they
are in control of their drinking, are drinking too much, are hurting
other people, and/or are alcoholic. Thus a high score reflects
ambivalence or uncertainty. A high score here reflects some openness to
reflection, as might be particularly expected in the contemplation stage
of change.
LOW scorers say that they do not wonder whether they
drink too much, are in control, are hurting others, or are alcoholic.
Note that a person may score low on ambivalence either because he
"knows" his drinking is causing problems (high Recognition), or because
he "knows" that he does not have drinking problems (low Recognition).
Thus a low Ambivalence score should be interpreted in relation to the
Recognition score.
TAKING STEPS
HIGH scorers report that they are already doing
things to make a positive change in their drinking and may have
experienced some success in this regard. Change is under way, and they
may want help to persist or to prevent backsliding. A high score on this
scale has been found to be predictive of successful change.
LOW scorers report that they are not currently doing
things to change their drinking and have not made such changes recently.
| back to top |